← Back to the story
Behind the work · Find-the-story session

How we found Millbrook's story

One working session, start to finish. Seven moves from "the numbers look fine" to a clear ask.

The one question we solved

Why are more pets coming in when there are fewer strays?

  1. 1

    Start with what's been studied

    Before touching the data, we mapped four issues researchers have actually documented: long stays for big dogs, rising family surrenders, lost pets that never get home, and surgery waits.

  2. 2

    Pick the twist with a heart

    Family surrenders won. It's a people problem dressed up as an animal problem, and it points to something a donor can fix.

  3. 3

    Look at the surface number

    Total intake barely moved over five years. On a board slide, that reads as "nothing changed."

    Client catch: flat totals looked fake, so we let them move like real years
  4. 4

    Split it open

    Strays fell by 550. Family surrenders rose by 560 and quietly filled the gap: from 1 in 6 animals to nearly 1 in 3.

    Found: the hidden shift
  5. 5

    Ask why

    3 in 4 surrenders came from rent, vet bills, or a caretaker's health. Only 1 in 6 were about the pet.

  6. 6

    Check every dollar against real data

    Our first guess for keeping a pet home was $185. Published programs report about $50. We used $75, still conservative, and the story got stronger.

    Client catch: "explain the dollars" led to the fix
  7. 7

    End with an ask, not a chart

    $45,000 helps 600 families and keeps about 425 pets home. Every $1 given avoids about $5 in shelter care.

What came out of it

Annual report storyThree charts, one clear ask Donor one-pagerPrints on a single page