Chart workshop · Handout

PAPER MOTH ANALYTICS

Five rules for charts a board will trust

Each rule shows the same survey twice: once the usual way, once fixed. Examples come from the Hearthside District sample.

1

Say the finding first.

A title that names the question makes the reader do the work.

Before

Q2. My school leadership supports me.

After

Support tracks who leaves.

2

Sort by the story, not the alphabet.

A–Z order looks tidy and hides who is high and who is low.

Before · A to Z
Alder80%
Birch Hill81%
Clover Lane77%
Dogwood72%
After · ranked
Juniper95%
Elm Street94%
Stonegate60%
Pinecrest58%
3

Give every number a neighbor.

A number alone can't be judged as good or bad. Show what to compare it to.

Before1 in 5left the weak-support schools
After2x21.0% at weak-support schools vs 9.7% at strong
4

Count people before percentages.

Rates come from headcounts. Compare shares by people, not by number of schools.

Before

20% of schools → 41% of leavers

These 4 schools are big, so this overstates it.
After

29% of teachers → 41% of leavers

56 of 137 people who left. Fair and still striking.
5

End with the decision the data supports.

The next step should follow from the finding, not from the loudest comment.

Before

Compensation study to be presented in fall.

After

Fund a support plan for the 4 schools first.

Try it on your next report

Pick one chart. Rewrite its title as a finding, sort it by value, and add one comparison. That takes about 10 minutes.

Hearthside District is an invented sample. Patterns modeled on RAND State of the American Teacher (2025), the NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey (2024), and the Learning Policy Institute.